The neuron doctrine: a revision of functional concepts.
نویسنده
چکیده
The functional tenets of the ineuiron doctrine were reviewed some time ago(l3), but there hlas been little attempt to correct obvious deficiencies or formulate new concepts that take iinto account the great amount of anatomical and physiological work of recent years. Among these sttudies, the findings of synapses betweeni (lendrites of nerve cells are of partictular interest (reviewe(d in 4). Tlle reports are by now sufficiently numerous and well-documented to indicate that dendrodendritic synapses are a widespread and important phenomenon in the vertebrate niervous systemn, especially the mammalian brain. However, the patterfns of connections andl the functions they mediate have been difficult to comprelhend within the context of the classical doctrine. It is timely tlherefore to reappraise the neuroin doctrine in the light of recent work. Discussion will be focuissedl on1 the mammalian olfactory bulb, where dendro(lendritic synapses were first identified(5) and wlhere the case for a revision of classical concepts can be set fortlh most clearly. Specific proposals will be made, that the neutroni can no longer be regarded as the basic functional unit of the nervotus system; ratlher, the nervotus system is organized on the basis of ftunctional uinits wlhose idlentity in many cases is independent of neuronal boundaries. It will be showni that these proposals are supported by increasing evidence from otlher work that goes beyond the confines of thle classical doctrine.
منابع مشابه
A neuron doctrine in the philosophy of neuroscience.
Many neuroscientists and philosophers endorse a view about the explanatory reach of neuroscience (which we will call the neuron doctrine) to the effect that the framework for understanding the mind will be developed by neuroscience; or, as we will put it, that a successful theory of the mind will be solely neuroscientific. It is a consequence of this view that the sciences of the mind that cann...
متن کاملTwo radical neuron doctrines
Two radical neuron doctrines must be distinguished--strong and weak. G&S direct much of their attack at the former--but the Churchlands only hold the latter. The weak radical neuron doctrine remains a serious possibility. G&S describe the radical neuron doctrine in a number of slightly different ways, and we think this hides an important distinction. On the one hand, the radical neuron doctrine...
متن کاملThe neuron doctrine, the mind, and the Arctic.
The late 19th century and early 20th century represent an era of significant progress and important discoveries. Explorers of unknown continents interacted with pioneers of neuroscience, including the founders of the neuron doctrine, which asserted that nerve tissue was composed of individual cells that were genetic, anatomic, functional, and trophic units. Fridtiof Nansen (1861-1930), an arcti...
متن کاملThe Concepts of Law
Concepts are the building blocks of legal doctrine. All legal rules and standards, in fact, are formed by combining concepts in different ways. But despite their centrality, legal concepts are not well understood. There is no agreement as to what makes a legal concept useful or ineffective—worth keeping or in need of revision. Social scientists, however, have developed a set of criteria for suc...
متن کاملNiels Bohr as philosopher of experiment_ Does decoherence theory challenge Bohr׳s doctrine of classical concepts?
Niels Bohr's doctrine of the primacy of “classical concepts” is arguably his most criticized and misunderstood view. We present a new, careful historical analysis that makes clear that Bohr's doctrine was primarily an epistemological thesis, derived from his understanding of the functional role of experiment. A hitherto largely overlooked disagreement between Bohr and Heisenberg about the movab...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine
دوره 45 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 1972